Paper 3 Section B

  In this text, Raina is a child that is 5 years old speaking with her mother while being outside. Children that are ages 3-5 are considered “preschoolers” and are considered to be advanced in English compared to younger children, but still learning how to properly structure sentences and how to implement grammar in everyday language. It is fairly obvious while reading the text excerpt that this child’s language capabilities shown in the transcript are accurately portrayed for the age of a developmental 5 years old. 


First of all, Raina’s language is pretty typical for a 5 year old; pretty advanced and easily comprehensible, but sprinkled with some misuses of words. Throughout the text, approximately two times, Raina uses the word “this” instead of “that” while referring to a certain thing. For example, she asks her mother “can we go in this field?” while she’s not even close by the field (indicated by her wanting to skip over to the described field). The proper way to express this sentence would be saying “that field”. Another interesting misuse of a word comes from the second to last sentence when she says “mum I’m /gana/ skip over there…”. Instead of saying “I am going to..”, she merges the words into the word “gana”. Everything else in the transcript, language wise, is correct, but this is clearly the language of a child in the developmental stages of learning the English language.


Second of all, the structure, similarly to the language skills, are pretty well expressed and used in an advanced manner. However, there are examples of forming improper sentence structure throughout the transcript. In a specific part when Rainer wants to go somewhere she wants, she says, “look (.) this way (.) I’m going to (.) going to (.) go over here”. While Raina has the idea of what she says, she obviously is having trouble putting her ideas into words. In this sentence she pauses a lot and even stutters while trying to utter the right sentence. This type of situation is common for preschoolers. As their minds are developing so fast, it is hard for them to properly communicate everything that they want to say.


Third of all, some of Raina’s certain linguistic choices that are used throughout the transcript are actually due to her mother. In language, there is a concept called LASS (Language Acquisition Support System) that says that young children frequently learn and use words that people around them like family or friends use themselves. For example, people found in the southern part of the United States use the word “y’all” a lot to refer to a group of people so many young kids grow up with this and use it because everyone around them uses the word. An example of this in the excerpt is when Raina refers to her mother as “mum” and right after her own mother refers to herself as “mummy”. The word “mum” is typically a term from the United Kingdom for “mother”. The use of this word clearly indicates that the daughter learned this from the environment around her. 


Another point that is fairly obviously seen in this excerpt is that imitation theory. The imitation theory is basically where one person sees someone else doing or saying something and decides to adopt their behavior. This theory can be found working its magic when the two are talking about a butterfly mentioned in the excerpt. Both of them use the word “LOOK” to refer to the butterfly that they see. It is not a coincidence that they both said this word because of the fact that the mother yelled the word first (indicated by the all caps) and was copied a few lines later by her daughter.


Overall, just in these few lines of text in this excerpt, readers can pick up on many different factors that go into the thought process and evolution of a young child’s mind. All the time around parents’ speech, cultural speech tendencies, and every other experience make up a big part of a young person’s future linguistic development and capabilities.


Comments

  1. Hi,

    AO1: 3 marks
    I feel you had a thorough comprehension of the material. What I mean is that you included clear references and short quotes, and you expanded on the meaning and ideas around the linguistic charge made by the youngster. You provided context for the sources you provided. You also mentioned the audience several times during your analysis, which is why I didn't give it a thorough and thorough analysis because you used extremely common Lexus throughout your explanation. I feel you would have received a higher score if you had divided your thoughts more clearly. Your allusions to the traits throughout the text were not effective and thorough; they were clear and intelligible, but they didn't work for the reader. "Children that are ages 3-5 are considered “preschoolers ``'' This is an example of the traits that you sought to expound on, however you might have used more buzz words to further explain your argument.

    AO4: 6 marks
    I feel you fell apart on this portion of the grading because you attempted to make sure you gave clear references to the starting qualities and did your utmost, but when it came to the broader range of knowledge about the linguistic accusation, you began to come apart. Because you didn't utilize many theories or buzzwords to assist you develop off of those concepts, you missed to employ a broader variety of information. Although you used theories, I don't feel you used the correct ones in the correct contact."LASS (Language Acquisition Support System)" is an excellent example of a theory you successfully used. This principle, I believe, may be utilized pretty frequently, and while it is beneficial to employ, if you just use it, it can seriously harm you. I say this because a lot of people are likely to utilize it in their studies of language acquisition in children aged 3 to 5. If this is your sole source of more information, it may be harmful to you because that is all we have to go on. You also didn't present a very compelling reason for using this theory or practice.

    AO5: 1 mark
    The sectioning of your comprehension and fundamental information is used for this phase of your analysis. I thought it was really simple, and the paragraphing made it quite difficult to grasp. It wasn't simple to read fluently without becoming stuck on what you were attempting to convey to the reader. Another issue is that it did not engage the audience or reader by beginning each paragraph with "Third of all," "first of all..." "Second of all," and "overall." This got monotonous and uninteresting, and it was the same thing in every paragraph. If you had started the paragraph with a better introduction, the reading experience may have been different. It could've also been made more fluid and free-flowing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AO1) You have a detailed understanding of text with effective reference to characteristic features. The small quotations with your elaboration is good. That was effective throughout the blog. (4 marks)
    AO4) There is a detailed understanding of linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches. Insightful reference to wider study of linguistic issues and concepts, as seen with reference to LASS. Clear reference to linguistic methods. (13 marks)
    AO5) Detailed selection, analysis and synthesis of language data. It is clear you know what you're talking about and that's great. (4 marks)
    21/25 marks good shi

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Usain Bolt AICE English Language - Andrew M.

Epigraph Blog - Andrew M.

The Three Parties - Andrew Meyers